An alternative to WriteHuman that puts fidelity first
WriteHuman is a regular name in humanizer benchmarks. Those same benchmarks tell an awkward story for the whole category: the harder a tool rewrites, the more the meaning drifts. TextPolishAI was designed the other way round.
Natural, neutral polish for any draft. One word of input = one word charged, only when the rewrite succeeds.
Why fidelity is our headline
In the HumanizerBench October 2026 cycle, WriteHuman scored well on style metrics but 60/100 on semantic fidelity — 12th of 14 tools. For a marketing paragraph that is an annoyance; for a contract email or a cover letter with real figures, it is a liability.
Our pipeline runs the other order: fidelity constraints first (facts, numbers, names, structure locked; length within 90–105%), style second. In our own pre-launch test, 10/10 sample documents kept every figure and name, with an average fidelity score of 94.2/100.
Pricing: WriteHuman runs $8–20/month by subscription with a few free tries. TextPolishAI: one-time packs, $9.99 for 20,000 words, never expiring.
Questions
Public third-party benchmark reporting (HumanizerBench, October 2026 cycle) as summarised in our evaluation notes. Tools change; check current figures before deciding.
Yes — the free allowance is enough: paste a paragraph with figures and names, polish it, and compare. That test is the product.